OK you've got LG...but with mt6575.
Mt6575 is a single core Cortex A9...LG chose it when mt6577 and even mt6589 were already available for a while.
You should read how Qualcomm treat LG (pages 45, 122, 154, 163, 170, 175...)
Judge Lucy H. Koh's May 21, 2019 findings of fact and conclusions of law in FTC v. Qualcomm
fr.scribd.com
Some quad cortex A7 like mt6589 or mt6582 worked as well as Qualcomm's quad Cortex A7 such as Snapdragon 400...
Your mt6592's was far higher (see Redmi Note for exemple...mt6592's version was far faster than Snapdragon 400's one...)
Plus it was in 2014, 6 years ago!
NVIDIA and Intel stopped making soc for smartphones...and Mediatek is still there!
The European Commission has fined Qualcomm € 242 million for abusing its market dominance in 3G baseband chipsets. Qualcomm sold below cost, with the aim of forcing its competitor Icera out of the market. This is illegal under EU antitrust rules.
ec.europa.eu
You have to analyse what you bought...
When you get a Redmi Note 8 Pro, you got Cortex A76, DynamIQ conception and UFS storage...and that's the performances you will get! Everyboby who test both Note 8 Pro and Note 7 will tell you about the huge gap beween Snapdragon 660 (Cortex A73 (relabeled Kryo 260 Gold), big.LITTLE with cycle hungry clusters migration and slower eMMC storage) and G90T...
Authentification process is an excuse as Indians already removed it...
You just have to read how official members are talking about Mediatek's, here and on Redmi 6's forum.
We can't accept to be ignored or even insulted because we refuse to follow the orders from official members.
Monopoly is dangerous for customers and official members here pray for monopoly as it is easier for them.
I remember a time when developers loved challenges and alternative hardwares (Amiga demo scene...)